A simple message for autocorrelation correctors: Don't
- 30 September 1995
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Econometrics
- Vol. 69 (1) , 267-288
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01671-l
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE POWER OF COINTEGRATION TESTSOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1992
- ON THE PITFALLS OF UNTESTED COMMON‐FACTOR RESTRICTIONS: THE CASE OF THE INVERTED FISHER HYPOTHESISOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1988
- Error autocorrelation revisited: the AR(1) caseEconometric Reviews, 1987
- ECONOMETRIC MODELLING: THE “CONSUMPTION FUNCTION” IN RETROSPECT*Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Some Tests of Dynamic Specification for a Single EquationEconometrica, 1980
- Serial Correlation as a Convenient Simplification, Not a Nuisance: A Comment on a Study of the Demand for Money by the Bank of EnglandThe Economic Journal, 1978
- Inferential Procedures in Nonlinear Models: An Application in a UK Industrial Cross Section Study of Factor Substitution and Returns to ScaleEconometrica, 1977
- TESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. IIBiometrika, 1951
- Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Auto- Correlated Error TermsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1949