Private versus social opportunity cost of time: Valuing time in the demand for health care
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 3 (3) , 149-155
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730030304
Abstract
In this paper we examine whether the current method of valuing time within economic appraisals is appropriate. The cost to society of time taken to use health care may differ from the private opportunity cost of such time. However, demand for health care may be affected by the private opportunity time cost and not by the value of time to society. In this paper we show that the private opportunity cost of time is a better predictor of demand for a screening service than the societal approach. It is important, therefore, to use the private opportunity cost of time when assessing the demand for, and impact of, a health care intervention.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population screening for low bone mineral density: Do non-attenders have a lower risk of osteoporosis?Osteoporosis International, 1994
- Time prices and the demand for GP servicesSocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- Screening for diabetic retinopathy: A relative cost‐effectiveness analysis of alternative modalities and strategiesHealth Economics, 1992
- Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?BMJ, 1990
- The Time Price of Medical CareThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987
- The dom project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The NetherlandsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- HOW “REPRESENTATIVE” ARE SUBJECTS ATTENDING A CORONARY RISK FACTOR SCREENING PROGRAMME?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Factors affecting the use of physician services in a rural community.American Journal of Public Health, 1976
- The Demand for Dental Care: A Study of Consumption and Household ProductionThe Journal of Human Resources, 1976
- A Theory of the Allocation of TimeThe Economic Journal, 1965