Receptor binding of propranolol is the missing link between plasma concentration kinetics and the effect-time course in man

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 6 healthy volunteers, the correlation between beta-adrenoceptor binding, the time course of the effect and plasma concentration kinetics was investigated from 0 to 48 h after a single oral dose of propranolol 240 mg. First, the in vitro beta-adrenoceptor interaction of propranolol was investigated. Propranolol inhibited beta-adrenoceptor binding to rat parotid (beta1) and reticulocyte (beta2) membranes in the presence of pooled human plasma with a Ki of about 8 ng/ml plasma. After oral administration of 240 mg propranolol, concentration kinetics in plasma could be described by a Bateman function with a fictive concentration at time 0 of 275 ng/ml plasma, and a mean elimination half-life of 3.5 h. Using the concentration kinetics of propranolol in plasma together with its in vitro beta-adrenoceptor binding characteristics in the presence of placebo plasma from each individual, the time course of antagonism against beta-adrenoceptor mediated effects was predicted. The latter was in agreement with the time course of propranolol-induced inhibition of tachycardia due to orthostasis. After bicycle ergometry, however, the time course of inhibition of tachycardia was shorter than was predicted. Plasma sampled at various times after propranolol administration inhibited beta-adrenoceptor binding of the radioligand 3H-CGP 12177 to rat reticulocyte membranes in a fashion reflecting the time course of inhibition of exercise tachycardia observed in the volunteers. A direct, linear relation was shown between the in vitro inhibition of beta-adrenoceptor binding by the plasma samples withdrawn after propranolol administration and the inhibition of exercise tachycardia observed in parallel. The results show that the concentrations of antagonist present in plasma are representative of the concentrations in the effect compartment. Deep compartments of drug distribution appear irrelevant to the effects of the drugs. The relation between the plasma concentration of propranolol and the reduction in heart rate at various levels of physical effort shows no significant inhibition at rest and increasing IC50-values from orthostasis to 2 min and to 4 min of ergometry. IC50-values after orthostasis are in the range of the Ki-values from in vitro receptor binding studies, whereas the IC50-values after exercise are shifted 2-to 3-fold to the right relative to the Ki-values. This finding is in agreement with increased beta-adrenoceptor stimulation with increasing effort (release of endogenous noradrenaline), which shifts the antagonist concentration-effect curve to the right. Furthermore, the rightward shift can explain why with increasing effort the time course of the inhibitory effect of propranolol becomes shorter. Release of propranolol from presynaptic stores during exercise is irrelevant, since this would result in opposed effects on the concentration-effect relationship (leftward shift) and the time course of antagonism (longer effect) with increasing work load. It is concluded that the receptor interaction of propranolol together with its plasma concentration kinetics can fully explain the time course of effects after a single oral dose, and so receptor interaction will be the missing link in the correlation between concentration kinetics and effect kinetics of propranolol in man. In general, this mode of correlation should be expandable to any drug exerting its effects according to the law of mass action via receptors in the extracellular space. This approach provides a rational basis for the comparison of different drugs from one group irrespective of their receptor affinity and concentration kinetics.