Impact of the GP contract on inequalities associated with influenza immunisation: a retrospective population-database analysis
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 61 (588) , e379-e385
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11x583146
Abstract
Influenza immunisation is recommended for all people aged ≥65 years and younger people with particular chronic diseases. The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) has provided new financial incentives for influenza immunisation since 2004. To determine the impact of the 2004 UK General Medical Services contract on the overall uptake of, and socioeconomic inequalities associated with, influenza immunisation. Retrospective general-practice population database analysis in 15 general practices in Scotland, UK. Changes in influenza-immunisation uptake for those in at-risk groups between 2003-2004 and 2006-2007 were measured, and variation in uptake examined using multilevel modelling. Uptake rose from 67.9% in 2003-2004 to 71.4% in 2006-2007. The largest increases were seen in those aged <65 years with chronic disease, with uptake rising from 49.6% to 58.4%, but rates remained considerably lower than in those aged ≥65 years. Differences between practices narrowed (median odds ratio [OR] for two patients randomly selected from different practices: 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.00 to 2.26) in 2003-2004 versus 1.44 (95% CI = 1.40 to 1.49) in 2006-2007. However, inequalities in uptake by patient socioeconomic status did not change: adjusted OR for most deprived versus most affluent was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.80) in 2003-2004 versus 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.76) in 2006-2007. Overall uptake rose significantly and differences between practices narrowed considerably. However, socioeconomic and age inequalities in influenza immunisation persisted in the first 3 years of the QOF. This contrasts with other ecological analyses, which have concluded that the QOF has reduced inequalities. The impact of financial incentives on inequalities is likely to vary, and some kinds of care may require more targeted improvement activity and support.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paying For Performance In Primary Care: Potential Impact On Practices And DisparitiesHealth Affairs, 2010
- Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderlyPublished by Wiley ,2010
- Impact of Pay for Performance on Ethnic Disparities in Intermediate Outcomes for Diabetes: A Longitudinal StudyDiabetes Care, 2009
- Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Management in Patients With Hypertension After the Introduction of Pay for PerformanceAnnals of Family Medicine, 2008
- Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the quality and outcomes frameworkBMJ, 2008
- Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes frameworkThe Lancet, 2008
- Coverage of Cervical Cancer Screening in 57 Countries: Low Average Levels and Large InequalitiesPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Practice postcode versus patient population: a comparison of data sources in England and ScotlandInternational Journal of Health Geographics, 2008
- The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in EnglandBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Effect of the UK Incentive-Based Contract on the Management of Patients With Stroke in Primary CareStroke, 2006