Can non-physician health-care workers assess and manage cardiovascular risk in primary care?
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by WHO Press
- Vol. 85 (6) , 432-440
- https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.06.032177
Abstract
Objective To ascertain the reliability of applying the WHO Cardiovascular Risk Management Package by non-physician health-care workers (NPHWs) in typical primary health-care settings. Methods Based on an a priori 80% agreement level between the NPHWs and the "expert" physicians (gold standard), 649 paired (matched) applications of the protocol were obtained for analysis using Kappa statistic and multivariate logit regression. Findings Results indicate over 80% agreement between raters, from moderate to perfect levels of agreement in almost all of the sections in the package. The odds of obtaining a difference between raters and a benchmark are not statistically significant. Conclusion Applying the WHO Cardiovascular Risk Management Package, NPHWs can be retrained to reliably and effectively assess and manage cardiovascular risks in primary health-care settings where there are no attending physicians. The package could be a useful tool for scaling up the management of cardiovascular diseases in primary health care.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic reviewHeart, 2006
- Brain drain of doctors from southern Africa: brain gain for AustraliaAustralian Health Review, 2006
- Riskard 2005. New tools for prediction of cardiovascular disease risk derived from Italian population studiesNutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 2005
- The accuracy of the Framingham risk-score in different socioeconomic groups: a prospective study.2005
- Cardiovascular risk and diabetes. Are the methods of risk prediction satisfactory?European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2004
- Health workforce imbalances in times of globalization: brain drain or professional mobility?The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2003
- The estimate of cardiovascular risk. Theory, tools and problems.2002
- Assessment of absolute risk of death after myocardial infarction by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations; GISSI-Prevenzione mortality risk chartEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- Validation of the Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Prediction ScoresJAMA, 2001
- Prediction of coronary risk for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: a comparison of methods.QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1999