TERMINOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY IN ABSTRACT AND CONCRETE DISCIPLINES
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Documentation
- Vol. 40 (4) , 247-263
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026767
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that the vocabulary of a discipline whose major emphasis is on concrete phenomena will, on the average, have fewer synonyms per concept than will the vocabulary of a discipline whose major emphasis is on abstract phenomena. Subject terms from each of two concrete disciplines and two abstract disciplines were analysed. Results showed that there was a significant difference at the ·05 level between concrete and abstract disciplines but that the significant difference was attributable to only one of the abstract disciplines. The other abstract discipline was not significantly different from the two concrete disciplines. It was concluded that although there is some support for the hypothesis, at least one other factor has a stronger influence on terminological consistency than the phonomena with which a subject deals.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Language and information retrieval in the social sciencesAslib Proceedings, 1982
- SUBJECT HEADINGS FOR MATHEMATICAL LITERATUREJournal of Documentation, 1980
- Some stylistic variations in scientific writingJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1978
- THE VARIATION IN THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF TITLES OF RESEARCH PAPERS WITH TIME AND DISCIPLINEJournal of Documentation, 1977
- Levels of technicality in scientific communicationInformation Processing & Management, 1976
- THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NATURAL LANGUAGE IN SCIENCE INDEXING AND RETRIEVALJournal of Documentation, 1974
- How Information Is Carried in Scientific Sub-LanguagesScience, 1972
- Terminology and content of the medical recordComputers and Biomedical Research, 1970
- Content Analysis of Scientific WritingsThe Journal of General Psychology, 1970