Comparison of the effectiveness of midazolam and diazepam in lipid emulsion as sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 1 (5) , 409-414
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.1987.tb00641.x
Abstract
In a study of 101 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 90% of patients had complete amnesia for the procedure after intravenous midazolam (average dose 10 mg), but only 61% had complete amnesia after intravenous diazepam in lipid emulsion (average dose 18.4 mg) (P = 0.0006). However, when assessed by two different tests, recovery within the first hour was significantly more rapid after diazepam (P less than 0.0001). Prolonged sedation (over 20 hours after injection) was reported occasionally by patients who had received either drug. Thus, as with patients who have been sedated with diazepam, those who have been sedated with midazolam should also be advised to avoid driving or operating machinery for at least 24 hours after injection.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sedation for gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and Diazemuls in patients with and without cirrhosis.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1986
- Prolonged midazolam elimination half‐life.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1986
- AGE AND NATURE OF OPERATION INFLUENCE THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF MIDAZOLAMBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- Clinical Importance of the Interaction of Diazepam and CimetidineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Diazepam or midazolam for endoscopy?BMJ, 1984
- Intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: diazepam versus midazolam.BMJ, 1984
- Midazolam: a water‐soluble benzodiazepineAnaesthesia, 1980
- Method for Measuring Cerebral Dysfunction in Patients with Liver DiseaseBMJ, 1970