Early success in using the relation between stimuli and rewards to deduce an abstract rule: Perceived physical connection is key.
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Developmental Psychology
- Vol. 39 (5) , 825-847
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.5.825
Abstract
Are spatial proximity (0.10-12.5 cm), temporal proximity (0-, 2-, and 5-s gaps), and/or perceived connectedness of stimulus and reward key to infants' ability to deduce an abstract nonmatching rule from reward feedback? In this investigation, 3 conditions of the delayed nonmatching to sample task were administered to infants 9, 12, and 15 months old, and 5 more conditions were administered just to 12-month-olds. Results showed that connectedness is key. In its presence, neither close spatial or temporal proximity was needed. In the absence of the perception that stimulus and reward were components of a single thing, even close spatial and temporal proximity were insufficient for infants in the 1st year to grasp the rule-based association between stimuli and rewards.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Understanding and Use of Symbols: The Model ModelCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1995
- Time windows in cognitive development.Developmental Psychology, 1995
- Young children's performance on a task sensitive to the memory functions of the medial temporal lobe in adults: The delayed nonmatching-to-sample task reveals problems that are due to non-memory-related task demands.Behavioral Neuroscience, 1994
- Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: Implications for information processing.Developmental Psychology, 1982
- Length of familiarization and preference for novel and familiar stimuliInfant Behavior and Development, 1980
- The Effect of Delayed Feedback on Infant Learning ReexaminedChild Development, 1979
- Perseverative Errors in Search by Young InfantsChild Development, 1973
- Orienting behavior and the S-R spatial discontiguity effect in monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965
- Contiguity relationships of stimulus, response, and reward as determinants of discrimination difficulty.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965
- Transposition in children as a function of age.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951