Urethral catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy is feasible and desirable
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
- Vol. 5 (4) , 291-295
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500601
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to assess the feasibility of urethral catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Twenty-two patients who underwent RRP with a watertight eight-suture vesicourethral anastomosis had their urethral catheter removed usually on postoperative day (POD) 3. The average day of urethral catheter removal was POD 3.2. At 3 months, 56% of patients required no or one protective pad to stay dry and 68.4% of patients ‘never leaked’ or ‘leaked occasionally’. Following RRP, the urethral catheter can be removed as early as POD 3 if the intraoperative anastomosis is watertight without compromising urinary continence.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- EARLY REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirableUrology, 2001
- Early catheter removal in 100 consecutive patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomyBJU International, 2000
- LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS TECHNIQUEJournal of Urology, 2000
- Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary resultsUrology, 2000
- EXPERIENCE WITH EARLY CATHETER REMOVAL AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2000
- Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomyUrology, 1997
- Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: A pilot studyUrology, 1995
- Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Men Treated for Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1995
- Radiographic Assessment of the Vesicourethral Anastomosis Directing Early Decatheterization Following Nerve-Sparing Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1989