Size-selective grazing of coastal bacterioplankton by natural assemblages of pigmented flagellates, colorless flagellates, and ciliates
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Microbial Ecology
- Vol. 23 (3) , 211-225
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00164097
Abstract
Fluorescently-labelled bacteria (FLB) were used to study the feeding strategies of a natural assemblage of estuarine protozoans and to examine whether the protozoan grazing could account for the in situ size structure of the bacterioplankton. The FLB, DTAF-stained enterococci, ranging in volume from 0.01 to 0.30 × 10−1 µm3, were added to a natural planktonic assemblage at a density of 5.5% of the natural bacterioplankton. Initial densities (individuals ml−1) were as follows: total natural bacteria, 2.2 × 106; FLB, 1.2 × 105; pigmented flagellates, 300; colorless flagellates, 250; and ciliates, 30. FLB consumption rates were determined by examining the contents of protozoan food vacuoles, and the long-term effect of grazing (over a period of 100 hours) was determined by monitoring the decline in the FLB density in experimental vessels. The average consumption rates of FLB by pigmented flagellates were similar to those by flagellates that lacked chloroplasts (0.9 and 0.6 FLB protozoan−1 hour−1, respectively). The ciliates consumed bacteria at an average rate that was 17-fold higher (per cell) than flagellates, and they displayed a greater preference for larger bacteria than did the flagellates. FLB of the mid-size classes (0.025–0.100 µm3) were heavily grazed by the entire protozoan assemblage; the smallest (0.100 µm3) FLB escaped protozoan grazing. This had a profound effect on the resulting size distribution of FLB. At the end of a 100-hour incubation, the percentage of mid-size FLB (0.025 to 0.100 µm3) decreased 2.0–2.2-fold, while the percentage of the smallest and the largest FLB increased 2.0–2.5-fold. Resultant densities of FLB were consistent with initial clearance rates determined for the protozoan groups. The grazing rates of protozoans on FLB were species-specific; whereas some species consumed FLB, others did not demonstrate bacterivory. The results suggest that protozoan grazing has a major effect on the size distribution of coastal bacterioplankton. By selectively feeding on a particular size-class of bacteria, planktonic ciliates may consume 15–90% day−1 of the standing stock of largest size classes of bacterioplankton. Thus, ciliates, which were present in low abundance in the field, could not balance the production of the entire bacterial community, but they may strongly influence the portion of the bacterial community represented by the largest bacterial class. The direct effect of flagellates (e.g., grazing) was limited to smaller bacteria.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacteria or microflagellates as a major food source for marine ciliates: possible implications for the microzooplanktonMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1990
- Protozoan grazing on planktonic bacteria and its impact on bacterial populationMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1990
- Bacterivory by pelagic choreotrichous ciliates in coastal waters of the NW Mediterranean SeaMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1989
- Clearance of bacteria-sized particles by natural populations of nanoplankton in the Chesapeake Bay outflow plumeMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1988
- Particle size selection, feeding rates and growth dynamics of marine planktonic oligotrichous ciliates (Ciliophora: Oligotrichina)Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1986
- Population dynamics and trophic coupling in pelagic microorganisms in eutrophic coastal watersMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1986
- Size-selective grazing by a microflagellate on pelagic bacteriaMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1986
- Bacterivory by microheterotrophic flagellates in seawater samplesLimnology and Oceanography, 1985
- Dynamics of microbial plankton communities: experiments in Kaneohe Bay, HawaiiMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1984
- Influence of Method on the Apparent Size Distribution of Bacterioplankton Cells: Epifluorescence Microscopy Compared to Scanning Electron MicroscopyMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1981