Influence of Method on the Apparent Size Distribution of Bacterioplankton Cells: Epifluorescence Microscopy Compared to Scanning Electron Microscopy
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Inter-Research Science Center in Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Vol. 5 (1) , 103-106
- https://doi.org/10.3354/meps005103
Abstract
Size distributions of unattached marine bacterioplankton determined by epifluorescence microscopy were compared with those determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Significant (up to 37%) and variable linear shrinkage occurred during preparation for SEM. Although far from perfect, epifluorescence microscopy of wet preserved cells is probably more accurate than SEM for determination of size and biovolume. Comparison of the distribution of bacterial size with literature data for the distribution of bacterial activity suggested that the small to medium sized bacteria (< 0.6 .mu.m diameter) are much more active, on a per unit volume basis, than larger bacteria.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacterioplankton in the coastal euphotic zone: Distribution, activity and possible relationships with phytoplanktonMarine Biology, 1980
- Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteriaApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1977
- Contribution of bacteria to standing crop of coastal plankton1Limnology and Oceanography, 1976