A comparison of intravenous cefoxitin and a combination of gentamicin and metronidazole as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 26 (10) , 661-664
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02553338
Abstract
In a prospective randomized clinical trial 103 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery received either cefoxitin or a combination of metronidazole and gentamicin. Six of 52 patients in the cefoxitin group (11.5 per cent) and six of 48 patients in the metronidazole/gentamicin group (12.5 per cent) developed serious wound infections. Two patients (3.8 per cent) in the cefoxitin group and one patient (2.1 per cent) in the metronidazole/gentamicin group developed deep sepsis. These results suggest that cefoxitin is as effective as the combination of metronidazole and gentamicin for prophylaxis against serious postoperative septic complications.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of intravenous and oral metronidazole as prophylactic in colorectal surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis with cefoxitin, or metronidazole and gentamicin in colorectal surgery. Is mannitol to blame?Journal of Hospital Infection, 1981
- Use of Peroperative CefoxitinR to Prevent Infection After Colonic and Rectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 1981
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefoxitin in Colorectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 1981
- Isolation and Properties of Metronidazole-Resistant Mutants of Bacteroides fragilisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1979
- CefoxitinDrugs, 1979
- Clinical safety and tolerance of cefoxitin sodium: an overviewJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1978
- PROPHYLACTIC SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTICS IN COLORECTAL SURGERYThe Lancet, 1977
- Tobramycin, amikacin, sissomicin, and gentamicin resistant Gram-negative rods.BMJ, 1976
- Antimicrobial Therapy of Experimental Intraabdominal SepsisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1975