Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 July 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 6 (7) , e1000097-269
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2009
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Acupuncture for shoulder painCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic ReviewsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987