The Duration of the Motion Aftereffect following Adaptation to First-Order and Second-Order Motion
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 23 (10) , 1211-1219
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p231211
Abstract
The magnitude of the motion aftereffect (MAE) obtained following adaptation to first-order or to second-order motion was measured by estimating its duration. The second-order adaptation stimulus was composed of contrast-modulated noise produced by multiplying two-dimensional (2-D) noise by a drifting 1 cycle deg−1 sine grating. The first-order adaptation stimulus was composed of luminance-modulated noise produced by summing, rather than multiplying, the noise and the sine grating. The test stimuli were directionally ambiguous motion patterns composed of either two oppositely drifting sine gratings added to noise or the contrast-modulated equivalent. The adaptation and test stimuli were equated for visibility by presenting them at the same multiple of direction-identification threshold. All possible combinations of first-order and second-order adaptation and test stimuli were examined in order to compare the magnitudes of the MAEs obtained following same adaptation and cross adaptation. After adaptation the test stimuli always appeared to drift coherently in the direction opposite to that of adaptation and the magnitudes of this MAE were very similar for all conditions examined. Statistical analyses of the results showed that there was no significant difference between the durations of the MAEs obtained in the same-adaptation and cross-adaptation conditions. The cross-adaptation effects suggest that either first-order or second-order motion are detected by a common low-level mechanism, or that separate parallel motion-detecting mechanisms exist, for the two types of motion, that interact at some later stage of processing.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attention-Based Motion PerceptionScience, 1992
- Form-Cue Invariant Motion Processing in Primate Visual CortexScience, 1992
- Short-range vs Long-range motion: Not a valid distinctionSpatial Vision, 1991
- Motion: The long and short of itSpatial Vision, 1989
- Effects of Luminance and Contrast on Direction of Ambiguous Apparent MotionPerception, 1985
- Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1985
- The perception of apparent movementPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1980
- Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motionPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1980
- Discontinuity of seen motion reduces the visual motion aftereffectPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effectsNature, 1963