“Why don’t they just tell me straight, why allocate it?” The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE, LASER THERAPY AND CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF MEN WITH SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC ENLARGEMENT: THE CLasP STUDY
  Journal of Urology, 2000
• A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE AND LASER THERAPY IN MEN WITH CHRONIC URINARY RETENTION: THE CLasP STUDY
  Journal of Urology, 2000
• Withholding consent to participate in clinical trials: decisions of pregnant women
  BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999
• Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial
  BMJ, 1998
• Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy.
  Journal of Medical Ethics, 1996
• Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children
  Social Science & Medicine, 1995
• Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research
  BMJ, 1995
• The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making.
  Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
• Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: Measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation
  Social Science & Medicine, 1991
• Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public
  JAMA, 1982