The impact of trial baseline imbalances should be considered in systematic reviews: a methodological case study
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 60 (12) , 1229-1233
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trialsPublished by Wiley ,2007
- Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journalsBMJ, 2005
- Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?Controlled Clinical Trials, 2004
- Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-upJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against decipheringThe Lancet, 2002
- Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurementsBMJ, 2001
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Understanding controlled trials: Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 1999
- Testing for baseline balance in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989