Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?
- 31 October 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 25 (5) , 515-524
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2004.04.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- The growth and future of biostatistics: (A view from the 1980s)Statistics in Medicine, 2003
- When can a clinical trial be called ‘randomized’?Vaccine, 2003
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- A sensitivity analysis for subverting randomization in controlled trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- A Broader Template for Analyzing Broken Randomized ExperimentsSociological Methods & Research, 1998
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- How to use an article on therapy or preventionCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Efficacy of Tonsillectomy for Recurrent Throat Infection in Severely Affected ChildrenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Design for the Control of Selection BiasThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957