Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 116 (1) , 117-142
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
Abstract
We define mental contamination as the process whereby a person has an unwanted response because of mental processing that is unconscious or uncontrollable. This type of bias is distinguishable from the failure to know or apply normative rules of inference and can be further divided into the unwanted consequences of automatic processing and source confusion, which is the confusion of 2 or more causes of a response. Mental contamination is difficult to avoid because it results from both fundamental properties of human cognition (e.g., a lack of awareness of mental processes) and faulty lay beliefs about the mind (e.g., incorrect theories about mental biases). People's lay beliefs determine the steps they take (or fail to take) to correct their judgments and thus are an important but neglected source of biased responses. Strategies for avoiding contamination, such as controlling one's exposure to biasing information, are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- The laws of sympathetic magicPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Recent perspectives on unconscious processing: Still no marketing applicationsPsychology & Marketing, 1988
- Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.Psychological Review, 1987
- Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoningCognitive Psychology, 1986
- Recent Research on Selective Exposure to InformationAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1986
- Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution ErrorSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1985
- Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics.Psychological Review, 1984
- Public Perceptions of Subliminal AdvertisingJournal of Advertising, 1983
- Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1981