Neurophysiology of geniculate ganglion (facial nerve) taste systems: species comparisons
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Chemical Senses
- Vol. 10 (1) , 89-127
- https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/10.1.89
Abstract
On the basis of various measures taken from geniculate ganglion taste neurons in four species, it was concluded that within each species the neurons could be subdivided into distinct functional groups. In this report, the neural groups of different species were directly compared. Units from all four species were studied with a common test series of solutions in addition to other stimuli. Since these stimuli were presented at the same concentrations to all species, direct quantitative comparisons across species were possible for a wide range of chemical compounds. In addition, the neural groups were compared with respect to spontaneous and evoked activity measures, latency to electrical stimulation, and receptive field characteristics. These neurophysiological data suggest a basic model of four distinct subgroups: acid units, salt units, amino acid units, and X units.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rat neurophysiological taste responses to salt solutionsChemical Senses, 1983
- Amino acids as taste stimuli. II. Quality codingBrain Research, 1982
- Amino acids as taste stimuli. I. Neural and behavioral attributesBrain Research, 1982
- Taste systems of goat geniculate ganglion.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1982
- Responses of rat chorda tympani fibers to electrical stimulation of the tongue.The Japanese Journal of Physiology, 1981
- The Interpretation of Variation in the Classification of Nerve CellsBrain, Behavior and Evolution, 1980
- Flavor preferences in cats (Felis catus and Panthera sp.).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977
- Amino Acids as Gustatory Stimuli in the RatThe Journal of general physiology, 1962
- GUSTATORY NERVE IMPULSES IN RAT, CAT AND RABBITJournal of Neurophysiology, 1955
- Species Differences in Taste ResponsesAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1955