Sympathy, empathy, and physician resource utilization
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 6 (5) , 420-423
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02598163
Abstract
Objective:To test the hypothesis that physicians preferring a sympathetic over an empathetic response to a hypothetical patient’s misfortune will utilize more health care resources in the care of their patients. Design:Physicians were asked to select either the sympathetic response or the empathetic response to a hypothetical patient’s misfortune (death of a spouse) and to state their preferences for intubation of a hypothetical end-stage lung-disease patient. For each physician, hospital records were retrospectively reviewed to assess the mean number of laboratory tests ordered per clinic patient and the mean duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitations he or she performed before declaring his or her efforts unsuccessful. Setting:General medicine clinic at a large urban hospital. Participants:101 physicians above the postgraduate year-1 level who attended the general medicine clinic. Measurements and main results:As hypothesized, physicians selecting the sympathetic option (n=58) had a greater mean preference for intubation (pn=38). Conclusions:These data suggest that the constructs of sympathy and empathy reflect psychological aspects of physicians that have a measurable influence on their practice behaviors.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Preference and Decision Making in Critical Care SituationsChest, 1988
- The paradox of appropriate care.1987
- The Paradox of Appropriate CareJAMA, 1987
- Risk Preference and Laboratory UseMedical Decision Making, 1987
- The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Physician utilization. The state of research about physicians' practice patterns.1985
- Physician UtilizationMedical Care, 1985
- Variability in Physician Bioethical Decision-MakingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1982