A Counterexample to the Rigidity Assumption in the Visual Perception of Structure from Motion
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 13 (2) , 213-217
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p130213
Abstract
It has been proposed that the human visual system prefers perceptions of objects that are rigid or undergo minimum form change. A counterexample is presented in which a rigid two-dimensional figure rotating in the frontal plane is perceived as a distorting three-dimensional shape. It is argued that this perception results from the stimulation of automatic processes for perceiving size change, and that these processes are not subject to a general rigidity assumption.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Motion Aftereffect: A Global Mechanism for the Perception of RotationPerception, 1980
- Visual Sensitivity to the Shape and Size of a Moving Object: Implications for Models of Object PerceptionPerception, 1980
- The Interpretation of Visual MotionPublished by MIT Press ,1979
- Visual Perception of Bending MotionPerception, 1973
- Perception of rotation in depth: A process model.Psychological Review, 1972
- ON THEORIES FOR VISUAL SPACE PERCEPTIONScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1970
- PERCEPTION OF MOTION AND CHANGING FORM: A study of visual perception from continuous transformations of a solid angle of light at the eyeScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1964