Intrathecal Neostigmine and Sufentanil for Early Labor Analgesia
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 91 (5) , 1293
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199911000-00020
Abstract
Background: Recent efforts to improve the combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique have focused on adding opioids to other classes of analgesics. In this study, the authors used intrathecal neostigmine in combination with intrathecal sufentanil to investigate the usefulness of neostigmine for reducing side effects and prolonging the duration of sufentanil. Methods: One hundred six healthy pregnant women in labor were enrolled in this study, which was divided into four phases. In all phases, patients received a CSE anesthetic while in the lateral position. In phase I, three groups of six women each received intrathecal neostigmine, 5, 10, or 20 microg, in an open-label, dose-escalating safety assessment. In phase II, 24 women received intrathecal sufentanil alone to establish an ED50 (dose that produces > 60 min of labor analgesia in 50% of patients). In phase III, an ED50 was established for sufentanil combined with a fixed dose of neostigmine (10 microg). In phase IV, 40 women received either twice the ED50 of sufentanil alone or twice the ED50 of sufentanil plus neostigmine, 10 microg. Results: Neostigmine alone had no adverse effects on maternal vital signs, fetal heart rate, or Apgar scores. Neostigmine, 20 microg, produced analgesia in one patient and severe nausea and vomiting in another. The ED50 for intrathecal sufentanil alone was 4.1 +/- 0.31 microg, and the ED50 for intrathecal sufentanil combined with neostigmine, 10 microg, was 3.0 +/- 0.28 microg. The duration of analgesia and side effects from double these ED50s (sufentanil, 9 microg, or sufentanil, 6 microg, plus neostigmine, 10 microg) were similar between groups. Conclusions: The 10-microg intrathecal neostigmine dose alone produced no analgesia or side effects, but reduced the ED50 of intrathecal sufentanil by approximately 25%. Additionally, doses approximately double these ED50s each produced a similar duration of analgesia and side effects, indicating intrathecal neostigmine shifts the dose-response curve for intrathecal sufentanil to the left.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intrathecal Sufentanil Dose Response in Nulliparous PatientsAnesthesiology, 1998
- Phase I Human Safety Assessment of Intrathecal Neostigmine Containing Methyl- and PropylparabensAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997
- Intrathecal Neostigmine for Post-Cesarean Section AnalgesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997
- Determination of the Dose-Response Relationship for Intrathecal Sufentanil in Laboring PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997
- Analgesic effect of subarachnoid neostigmine in two patients with cancer painPain, 1996
- Dose-Response Study of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Intrathecal Neostigmine, Their Combination, or Placebo for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Anterior and Posterior VaginoplastyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1996
- Intrathecal Sufentanil Compared to Epidural Bupivacaine for Labor AnalgesiaAnesthesiology, 1994
- Neostigmine Counteracts Spinal Clonidine-induced Hypotension in SheepAnesthesiology, 1993
- A Comparison of Intrathecal, Epidural, and Intravenous Sufentanil for Labor AnalgesiaAnesthesiology, 1992
- Fetal Heart Rate Variability After Epidural Fentanyl During LaborAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1990