Doing research in prison: The strengths and weaknesses of full participation as a guard
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 3 (1) , 15-32
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828600088771
Abstract
Prison research has traditionally been conducted by outsiders, or researchers in non-participant roles. This paper, however, demonstrates that involvement in the prison as a prison guard, an insider, is a viable and needed form of participant observation. As an insider, the author was able to collect data on behaviors often concealed from other fieldworkers. However, participation as a member was not problem-free and this paper addresses the strengths, weaknesses, and ethical dilemmas of full participation as a research role. The paper also addresses whether or not full participation hinders or hampers data collection when the researcher returns to the same setting but in the traditional or outside role.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coopting the kept: Using inmates for social control in a southern prisonJustice Quarterly, 1984
- Sex and Occupational Socialization among Prison GuardsCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1982
- When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observationQualitative Sociology, 1982
- ROLE STRESS, CUSTODY ORIENTATION, AND DISCIPLINARY ACTIONSCriminology, 1980
- ROLE CONFLICT IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONSCriminology, 1980
- Integrating the Keepers: A Comparison of Black and White Prison Guards in IllinoisSocial Problems, 1978
- Drop Outs and Rejects: An Analysis of the Prison Guard's Revolving DoorCriminal Justice Review, 1977
- Prison GuardUrban Life, 1975
- Participant Observation in PrisonUrban Life and Culture, 1974
- Individual and mass behavior in extreme situations.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943