RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TACROLIMUS PLUS MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL OR AZATHIOPRINE VERSUS CYCLOSPORINE ORAL SOLUTION (MODIFIED) PLUS MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL AFTER CADAVERIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: RESULTS AT 2 YEARS1
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 72 (2) , 245-250
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200107270-00014
Abstract
A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P =0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- CLINICAL DETERMINANTS OF MULTIPLE ACUTE REJECTION EPISODES IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1Transplantation, 2000
- RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TACROLIMUS (PROGRAF) IN COMBINATION WITH AZATHIOPRINE OR MYCHOPHENOLATE MOFETIL VERSUS CYCLOSPORINE (NEORAL) WITH MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL AFTER CADAVERIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION1, 2Transplantation, 2000
- Delayed graft function: risk factors and the relative effects of early function and acute rejection on long‐term survival in cadaveric renal transplantationClinical Transplantation, 1999
- DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1998
- DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION: RISK FACTORS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RENAL ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL1Transplantation, 1997
- A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL COMPARING LEUKOCYTE FUNCTION-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN-1 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY WITH RABBIT ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN AS INDUCTION TREATMENT IN FIRST KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONSTransplantation, 1996
- The relative influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on renal transplant survivalTransplant International, 1996
- DETERMINANTS OF GRAFT SURVIVAL AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1996
- DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION, ACUTE REJECTION, AND OUTCOME AFTER CADAVER RENAL TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1995
- EARLY FUNCTION AS THE PRINCIPAL CORRELATE OF GRAFT SURVIVALTransplantation, 1988