Professional Norms and Physician Attitudes Toward Euthanasia
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 22 (1) , 36-40
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1994.tb01273.x
Abstract
The chair of the ethics committee of a major medical center agonized over how he, as a physician, and his organization should deal with Initiative 119, which, if passed, would legalize physician involvement in active, voluntary euthanasia in Washington State. In the end, he said, he could not vote for aid-in-dying because, “However much I want to reduce suffering, I myself just couldn’t do it to one of my patients.” He spoke of a personal distaste for the potential act, of a profound desire not to have to do it. It was not an ethical argument, but an honest and compelling expression of feelings.Why can’t this sincere man do it, even for patients who request such aid? In a 1991 poll, taken in Washington State prior to the vote on Initiative 119, 49 percent of the physicians surveyed supported the initiative, but 75 percent did not want to participate in aid-in-dying.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.American Journal of Public Health, 1993
- Care of the Hopelessly IllNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Washington's I-119Hastings Center Report, 1992
- Voluntary Active EuthanasiaHastings Center Report, 1992
- Physicians' Aid in DyingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Euthanasia — A CritiqueNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Doctors Must Not Kill'JAMA, 1988
- A piece of my mind. It's over, DebbieJAMA, 1988
- On the Definition and Teaching of the Medical EthicNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Active and Passive EuthanasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975