Short duration signals and learning a simple vibrotactile code
- 1 December 1969
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 21 (3) , 319-324
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049536908257800
Abstract
Ss in 4 groups learned a 9‐element vibrotactile code in which there were 3 intensities and 3 durations of signals. The durations of signals were varied over groups to determine whether at least 1 group of Ss would be unable to learn the code due to the brevity of the signals. There were no significant differences between the groups over 10 of the signals. There were no significant differences between the groups over 10 trials although durations ranged from 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 sec. for Group 1 to 0.01, 0.18 and 0.36 sec. for Group 4. The data suggested that it may be possible to shorten signals durations in a practical vibrotactile conmmunication system provided interstimulus intervals are carefully selected.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- An evaluation of vibrotactile signalling apparatusAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1968
- The initial effect of noise on a simple vibrotactile learning taskPerception & Psychophysics, 1967
- A Differential Comparison of Two Types of Electropulse Alphabets Based on Locus of StimulationPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1967
- Vibrotactile learningPsychonomic Science, 1967
- Temporal factors in perception and short-term memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- Simple Electromechanical Vibration TransducerReview of Scientific Instruments, 1965
- Multiple Cutaneous Stimulation: The Discrimination of Vibratory PatternsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965
- Some Neglected Possibilities of CommunicationScience, 1960
- The effect of high and low female sex hormone concentration on the two-point threshold of pain and touch and upon tactile sensitivity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1933