A Differential Comparison of Two Types of Electropulse Alphabets Based on Locus of Stimulation
- 1 June 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 24 (3_suppl) , 1039-1044
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1967.24.3c.1039
Abstract
Recognition accuracy was observed on 25 Ss with variation in the type placement (single- and multi-body regions) when varying numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, and 7) of electrode sites were pulsed simultaneously from among a 10-electrode array. Accuracy dropped drastically with increased number of sites pulsed and was most pronounced when the electrode array was restricted to a single region of the body. The accumulated data appear to cast serious doubt on the use of patterning of simultaneous electropulses as a fruitful approach to tactual communication. An alternative approach was proposed.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electropulse Responsivity to Changes in Skin MoisturePerceptual and Motor Skills, 1967
- Stimulus Parameter Considerations and Individual Differences in Cutaneous Sensitivity to Electropulse StimulationPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1966
- Effects of Intense Noise on Processing of Cutaneous Information of Varying ComplexityPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1965
- Effects of Time-Sharing and Body Positional Demands on Cutaneous Information ProcessingPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1965
- Masking of Cutaneous Sensations in Multiple Stimulus PresentationsPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1965
- Effects of Double Simultaneous Stimulation of the SkinThe American Journal of Psychology, 1964
- Electrical Stimulation of Pain and Touch SystemsNature, 1963
- Multiple comparison in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 1959