Intellectual capital: a Habermasian introduction
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Intellectual Capital
- Vol. 1 (2) , 187-200
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010377496
Abstract
Intellectual capital creation is theorised in this conceptual paper as a dynamic process of collective knowing that is capable of being leveraged into market value. The tacit, intangible and socially unconscious nature of substantive parts of this dynamic process presents some daunting theoretical challenges. Adopting a broadly social constructionist epistemology and a pluralist ontology, the point of departure introduced here is the set of symmetric and reciprocal relations presupposed in Jürgen Habermas’ theory of communicative action. In this worldview, interaction, as distinct from individual action, becomes the germ‐cell or basic unit of theoretical analysis. The relations and validity claims built into the medium of communicative action, viewed here as the nexus of intellectual capital creation, are substantive and real phenomena; they are thus open to empirical investigation.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Balanced ScorecardTechnometrics, 1998
- Pluralist Epistemology and the Knowledge-Based Theory of the FirmOrganization, 1998
- Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational AdvantageAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- Habermas: A Critical IntroductionBritish Journal of Sociology, 1996
- Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and CommunicationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1994
- Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational CorporationJournal of International Business Studies, 1993
- ORGANIZATIONS AS RHETORIC: KNOWLEDGE‐INTENSIVE FIRMS AND THE STRUGGLE WITH AMBIGUITYJournal of Management Studies, 1993
- Rationality TodaySociological Theory, 1991
- The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.American Sociological Review, 1956