Control the Purpose, Not the Contents: Coaching the Creation of Teaching Portfolios
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Action in Teacher Education
- Vol. 18 (1) , 71-81
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1996.10462823
Abstract
Portfolio systems are proliferating to evaluate preservice teachers, but they increasingly include lengthy lists of required elements, forms of reflection, and methods of display. Meanwhile, portfolio systems for university faculty allow considerable freedom of expression. Portfolio programs not only can, but must, allow students both freedom and responsibility in portfolio construction if portfolios are to become valid and reliable alternatives to exit exams. In this article, I demonstrate how to guide responsible construction of individually surprising student teacher portfolios. The article includes examples of portfolios created by graduate and undergraduate teaching students.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- “What Do You Really Care about Here?”: Portfolios as Rites of PassageLanguage Arts, 1994
- Performance‐based assessment of biology teachers: Promises and pitfallsJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- Case records as personal teaching texts for study in preservice teacher educationTeaching and Teacher Education, 1993
- Portfolios in Teacher EducationJournal of Teacher Education, 1993
- Assessment of preservice teachers and the use of portfoliosTheory Into Practice, 1993
- The Use of Portfolios in Assessing Teacher Competence: Measurement IssuesAction in Teacher Education, 1993
- Portfolios for science education: Issues in purpose, structure, and authenticityScience Education, 1992
- Getting a Job: Perceptions of Successful Applicants for Teaching PositionsAction in Teacher Education, 1990
- Portfolios as Large-scale AssessmentLanguage Arts, 1990
- Portfolios and Case Studies to Evaluate Teacher Education Students and ProgramsAction in Teacher Education, 1988