Subgroup analysis in clinical trials

This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:

• Baseline data in clinical trials
  The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003
• A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
• Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problems
  Statistics in Medicine, 2002
• The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
  The Lancet, 2001
• Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives
  Health Technology Assessment, 2001
• Subgroups, treatment effects, and baseline risks: Some lessons from major cardiovascular trials
  American Heart Journal, 2000
• Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials
  The Lancet, 2000
• Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
• Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical Trials
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
• Clinical judgment and statistics. Lessons from a simulated randomized trial in coronary artery disease.
  Circulation, 1980