Comments on dynamic interpretation of faulting
- 1 November 1963
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics
- Vol. 6 (5) , 757-768
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1963.10423622
Abstract
Consideration of the stress ellipsoid shows that the Principal Horizontal Stress (PHS) direction may not be a determinable or particularly significant stress direction for some kinds of faults. Principal stress magnitudes, as well as principal stress directions, can play a role in fixing the orientation of PHS. The usefulness of a method for PHS location recently proposed by Lensen is questioned on this basis and also because considerable errors may arise from its application to faults for which the PHS direction is determinable. Fault dip and the angle between a fault and the greatest principal stress direction are considered important factors given insufficient attention in Lensen's analysis. An alternative method for location of stress directions is discussed briefly.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geometrical significance of isallo stressNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1963
- ON FOLDING DURING THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROGRESSIVE DEFORMATIONQuarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 1962
- The Mechanics of Oblique Slip FaultingGeological Magazine, 1959
- Measurement of compression and tension: Some applicationsNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1958
- Note on the compressional angle between intersecting transcurrent clockwise and anti-clockwise faultsNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1958
- NATURE OF FAULTING IN LARGE EARTHQUAKESGSA Bulletin, 1957
- WRENCH-FAULT TECTONICSGSA Bulletin, 1956
- Geometry of Shearing Stress and Relation to FaultingThe Journal of Geology, 1951
- MECHANICAL BASIS FOR CERTAIN FAMILIAR GEOLOGIC STRUCTURESGSA Bulletin, 1951
- STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS AND FAULTINGGSA Bulletin, 1951