Usefulness of the Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Kinetic for Chemotherapy Monitoring in Patients With Unresectable Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (22) , 3681-3686
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.15.0904
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) kinetic and response to chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods The kinetic was calculated using the slope of an exponential-regressive curve connecting the semi-logarithmic values of CEA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to select the CEA slope thresholds to define patients with progressive or responsive disease with the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnosis accuracy odds ratio (DOR). The correlation between the CEA slopes and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by the Cox model and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results A total of 122 patients were included. Progression defined by CEA slope greater than +0.05 resulted in sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 85.1%, and DOR of 34. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve was 0.885 (95% CI, 0.815 to 0.936; P = .0001). Response defined by CEA slope less than −0.2 resulted in sensitivity of 74.7%, specificity of 82.5%, and DOR of 16. The AUROC curve was 0.847 (95% CI, 0.770 to 0.906; P = .0001). The difference between AUROC curves calculated with six or four CEA values was not significant. PFS was correlated with CEA slopes (hazard ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.48 to 8.57). The median PFS was 10 months for patients with CEA slope values less than −0.2 months versus 6 months for patients with CEA slope values greater than −0.2 (P < .0001). Conclusion These results suggest that the CEA kinetic is an accurate, simple, and noninvasive method to identify the disease progression in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- ASCO 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Measures of Response: RECIST, WHO, and New AlternativesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- CA 125 half-life and CA 125 nadir during induction chemotherapy are independent predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer outcome: results of a French multicentric studyAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- Systemic Therapy for Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Cancer Statistics, 2005CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2005
- Any Clinical Benefit From the Use of Oncofoetal Markers in the Management of Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinomas?Clinical Oncology, 2004
- CEA and CA19-9 measurement as a monitoring parameter in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) under palliative first-line chemotherapy with weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA)Annals of Oncology, 2001
- The use of tumour markers CEA, CA-195 and CA-242 in evaluating the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Significance of a fall in serum CEA concentration in patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for disseminated colorectal cancer.Gut, 1987
- Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a monitor of chemotherapy in disseminated colorectal cancerCancer, 1978