The SF‐36v2 and SF‐12v2 health surveys in New Zealand: norms, scoring coefficients and cross‐country comparisons
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 37 (1) , 24-31
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population normsQuality of Life Research, 2007
- A challenge to the cross-cultural validity of the SF-36 health survey: factor structure in Māori, Pacific and New Zealand European ethnic groupsSocial Science & Medicine, 2000
- SF-36 health survey reliability, validity and norms for New ZealandAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 1999
- The Conceptual Validity and Appropriateness of Using Health-related Quality of Life Measures with Minority Ethnic GroupsEthnicity & Health, 1999
- Translating Health Status Questionnaires and Evaluating Their QualityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- An Examination of Self- and Telephone-Administered Modes of Administration for the Australian SF-36Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- The Factor Structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 CountriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health SurveyMedical Care, 1996
- Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National SurveyMedical Care, 1994
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992