Creating discursive space through a rhetoric of difference: Chicana feminists craft a homeland
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quarterly Journal of Speech
- Vol. 82 (2) , 142-156
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639609384147
Abstract
When Chicana feminists refuse to accept mainstream definitions of themselves and insist that they establish and affirm their own identity, they build a space through discourse. For Chicana feminists, this process is accomplished in three stages. They begin by merely carving out a space within which they can find their own voice. After establishing this space, they begin to turn it into a home where connections to those within their families are made strong. Finally, recognizing their still existing connections to various other groups, Chicana feminists construct bridges or pathways connecting them with others. Such a process allows for the construction of boundaries that establish the Chicana feminist homeland as distinct but are flexible enough to allow for interaction with other homelands.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethnic heritage as rhetorical legacy: The plan of DelanoQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1994
- Television, black Americans, and the American dreamCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1989
- The domestic economy of television viewing in postwar AmericaCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1989
- Covering the homeless: The Joyce Brown storyCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1989
- Gendered technology, gendered practiceCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1988
- Oppositional decoding as an act of resistanceCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1988
- Securing the middle ground: Reporter formulas in60 minutesCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1987
- Media consumption and girls who want to have funCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1987
- Television: Polysemy and popularityCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1986
- Free Jazz and black nationalism: A rhetoric of musical styleCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1986