A Comparison of Anatrophic Nephrolithotomy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with and without Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Management of Patients with Staghorn Calculi
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 145 (4) , 710-714
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38431-8
Abstract
A retrospective study was conducted comparing anatrophic nephrolithotomy (10 cases), percutaneous nephrolithotomy alone (4 cases) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (23 cases) for the treatment of large staghorn calculi. A comparison based on collecting system anatomy demonstrated that anatrophic nephrolithotomy resulted in a greater stone-free rate, shorter hospitalization and lower costs while complication rates were similar. Anatrophic nephrolithotomy should still be considered a viable treatment option, especially for patients with large branched calculi in complex collecting systems.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Open Stone Surgery Since Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1989
- Comparison of Results and Morbidity of Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1987
- Staghorn Calculi: Percutaneous Extraction Versus Anatrophic NephrolithotomyJournal of Urology, 1986
- Combined Treatment of Branched Calculi by Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1986
- Percutaneous Removal of Kidney Stones: Review of 1,000 CasesJournal of Urology, 1985
- Anatrophic nephrolithotomy for removal of staghorn or branched renal calculiUrology, 1980
- Retrospective Study of 95 Patients with Staghorn Calculus DiseaseJournal of Urology, 1977
- The Case for a More Aggressive Approach to Staghorn StonesJournal of Urology, 1976
- One Hundred Cases of Nephrolithotomy Under HypothermiaJournal of Urology, 1974
- Anatrophic Nephrotomy and Plastic CalyrhaphyJournal of Urology, 1968