Evaluation of three-breed composites alongside Angus controls for growth, reproduction, maternal, and carcass traits
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- animal science
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
- Vol. 36 (3) , 341-348
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1993.10417731
Abstract
Angus cows at two locations were used to generate purebred controls and three three-breed crosses, as a result of inter-mating two-breed (halfbred Angus) crosses. The three-breed crosses were: 25% Simmental, 25% Friesian, 50% Angus (SiFA) from reciprocal matings between SiA and FA crosses; 25% Maine Anjou, 25% Jersey, 50% Angus (MaJA) from reciprocal matings between MaA and JA crosses; and 25% Blonded' Aquitaine, 25% Jersey, 50% Angus (BaJA) both from matings between JA bulls and BaA cows, and from matings between BaJ bulls and A cows. Breed crosses for this experiment were selected as potentially contributing to productive crossbred cows, based on the early years of two-breed cross data. After producing the first generation (F1) of three-breed crosses, each cross was subsequently interbred to produce F2 and F3 calves (202 sire groups overall). There were overlapping generations and contemporary controls, to compare crosses for growth, reproduction, maternal and carcass traits. The three three-breed crosses had greater yearling weights as F1s than contemporary A animals, by an average of 7.5%. Calf survival of the breed-types and generations was similar to A, except for SiFA Fl calves which experienced more difficulty and 17% greater birth weights than A calves. Three-breed cross cows were, on average, 7% heavier than A cows as Fls and their calves were 11% heavier at weaning than A calves. On average, the Fl cows showed a 12% advantage over A in calves weaned per cow joined, 24% in productivity, and 16% in productivity adjusted for cow weight (efficiency ratio). For carcass data (BaJA and A only), the BaJA calves were heavier and leaner than A controls. The breed types varied in their advantages in efficiency ratio, relative to A, and this appeared to depend on the pathway and dam genotype used to breed them. The efficiency ratio of contemporary two-breed crosses was similar to that of the three-breed crosses on average. The best breed types were two-breed crosses, so the three-breed crosses were likely to be less favoured by the farmer.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of two-breed composites alongside Angus or Hereford controls for growth, reproduction, maternal, and carcass traitsNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1993
- Evidence of genotype by environment interaction for reproductive and maternal traits in beef cattleAnimal Science, 1993
- Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for reproduction and maternal traits of beef cattleJournal of Animal Science, 1992
- Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for puberty and scrotal traits of beef cattleJournal of Animal Science, 1991
- Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for preweaning traits of beef cattle.Journal of Animal Science, 1991
- Evaluation of eleven cattle breeds for crossbred beef production: performance of progeny up to 13 months of ageAnimal Science, 1990
- Evaluation of eleven cattle breeds for crossbred beef production: carcass data from males slaughtered at two agesAnimal Science, 1990
- Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequalBiometrika, 1971