Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: The paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis
- 29 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 258-266
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(92)90475-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of “silent” restenosis and long-term follow-up after successful angioplasty in single vessel coronary artery disease: The value of quantitative exercise electrocardiography and quantitative coronary angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Restenosis after angioplasty: Don't rely on the exercise testAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Quantitative exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy for predicting angina recurrence after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Stress thallium-201 imaging after coronary angioplasty predicts restenosis and recurrent symptomsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Influence of balloon size on initial success, acute complications, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A prospective randomized study.Circulation, 1988
- Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months.Circulation, 1988
- Restenosis After Successful Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty: Serial Angiographic Follow-Up of 229 PatientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease.Circulation, 1986
- Early detection of restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by exercise-redistribution thallium scintigraphyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): A report from the PTCA registry of the national heart, lung, and blood instituteThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984