Breed and sex effects on the development and proportions of muscle, fat and bone in pigs
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 108 (1) , 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600064121
Abstract
The development and proportions of muscle, fat and bone were studied in 341 entire male and female Iron Age (European Wild Pig × Tamworth), Pietrain and Large White pigs ranging in live weight from 12 to 370 kg. The number of pigs was: Large White, 138 entire males and 112 females; Pietrain, 41 entire males and 31 females; Iron Age, eight entire males and 11 females. The breeds and sexes were compared in terms of the allometric growth coefficients of tissues (b) and of tissue weights at constant side weight and constant weight of total side bone.At the geometric mean for side weight (26·5 kg), Pietrain carcasses had the most muscle (16 kg), followed by Large White (15kg) and Iron Age (11 kg), but the least fat (6 kg). Large White and Iron Age carcasses had 7 and 12 kg of fat, respectively. Relative to side weight, the earliest maturing tissue, bone, was particularly slow growing in Iron Age pigs (b = 0·627) and relatively fast growing in Large Whites (b = 0·801). The opposite was true for fat, the latest maturing tissue, and consequently Iron Age (b = 1·345) and Large White (b = 1·164) pigs were identified as early and late maturing, respectively. Pietrains had a higher growth coefficient for fat relative to side weight (b = 1·249) and lower growth coefficient for bone (b = 0·713) than Large Whites. The difference in percentage fat between Pietrains and Large Whites decreased slightly between 65 and 120 kg live weight. In terms of tissue growth patterns, Pietrains therefore demonstrated early maturing characteristics compared with Large Whites, and it is possible that a low voluntary feed intake under ad libitum feeding conditions prevents them from expressing these characteristics in terms of percentage of fat in the side. Pietrains had a particularly high muscle:bone ratio (6·2 at the mean side weight) compared with Large White (5·2) and Iron Age pigs (5·3).The difference in carcass composition between entire males and females was breeddependent. Entire male carcasses were slightly leaner overall and had a lower muscle: bone ratio than those of females, but tissue allometric growth patterns were similar in the two sexes.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The carcass composition of male, castrated male and female pigs resulting from two levels of feedingThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1980
- The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pig carcass development: 1. Primary components, tissues and jointsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979
- A comparison of tissue weight distribution in Landrace, Hampshire and Duroc Jersey pigsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979
- Response to different rates of energy intake by Gloucester Old Spot and Large White boars and gilts given the same total feed allowanceAnimal Science, 1979
- Growth of bovine tissues 1. Genetic influences on growth patterns of muscle, fat and bone in young bullsAnimal Science, 1978
- The Belgian Piétrain as a sire of crossbred pigs slaughtered at 64 kg live weight. 1. Performance and carcass characteristicsAnimal Science, 1976
- A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight 1. Growth changes in carcass compositionAnimal Science, 1974
- Studies on Belgian Pietrain pigs 1. A comparison of Pietrain, Landrace and Pietrain Landrace crosses in growth, carcass characteristics and meat qualityAnimal Science, 1972
- TISSUE DEVELOPMENT IN SWINE AS INFLUENCED BY LIVEWEIGHT, BREED, SEX AND RATIONCanadian Journal of Animal Science, 1971
- Quantitative anatomical studies of the composition of the pig at 50, 68 and 92 kg. carcass weight II. Gross composition and skeletal compositionThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1962