Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps
- 11 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 66 (7) , 643-647
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348709022072
Abstract
Risks to the mother and newborn associated with the use of the Kobayashi Silastic vacuum extractor (n = 293) were compared with those associated with the use of low forceps (n = 468) in a retrospective chart review. Third or fourth degree perineal tears and vaginal and cervical lacerations were all observed less frequently among women delivered with the vacuum extractor. The need for post-partum bladder catheterization was also reduced for these women. Babies born by the means of the vacuum extractor ran an increased risk of cephalhematoma and neonatal jaundice. No difference in major neonatal morbidity was observed between the two groups. The Kobayashi instrument appears to be a useful alternative to forceps in low vaginal instrumental deliveries.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forceps or Vacuum Extraction? A Comparison of Effects on the Newborn InfantActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- Vacuum extraction or forceps?BMJ, 1986
- Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- The Vacuum Extractor for Obstetric DeliveryClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Vacuum extraction and neonatal jaundicejpme, 1982
- COMPARISON OF MATERNAL AND FETAL EFFECTS OF VACUUM EXTRACTION WITH FORCEPS OR CESAREAN DELIVERIES1981
- Meatal Colonization and Catheter-Associated BacteriuriaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- VACUM EXTRACTIONObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1975
- Massive Subaponeurotic Haemorrhage in Infants Born by Vacuum ExtractionBMJ, 1969
- Five Years' Experience with the Vacuum ExtractorBMJ, 1964