Isolation of the CXC chemokines ENA‐78, GROα and GROγ from tumor cells and leukocytes reveals NH2‐terminal heterogeneity
Open Access
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Biochemistry
- Vol. 260 (2) , 421-429
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00166.x
Abstract
Chemokines are a family of chemotactic peptides affecting leukocyte migration during the inflammatory response. Post‐translational modification of chemokines has been shown to affect their biological potency. Here, the isolation and identification of natural isoforms of the neutrophil chemoattractants GROα and GROγ and the epithelial‐cell‐derived neutrophil attractant‐78 (ENA‐78), is reported. Cultured tumor cells produced predominantly intact chemokine forms, whereas peripheral blood monocytes secreted mainly NH2‐terminally truncated forms. The order of neutrophil chemotactic potency of these CXC chemokines was GROα > GROγ > ENA‐78 both for intact and truncated forms. However, truncated GROα(4,5,6‐73), GROγ(5‐73) and ENA‐78(8,9‐78) were 30‐fold, fivefold and threefold more active than the corresponding intact chemokine. As a consequence, truncated GROα(4,5,6‐73) was 300‐fold more potent than intact ENA‐78 indicating that both the type of chemokine and its mode of processing determine the chemotactic potency. Similar observations were made when intact and truncated GROα, GROγ and ENA‐78 were compared for their capacity to induce an increase in the intracellular calcium concentration in neutrophilic granulocytes, and to desensitize the calcium response towards the CXC chemokine granulocyte chemotactic protein‐2 (GCP‐2). It must be concluded that physiological proteolytic cleavage of CXC chemokines in general enhances the inflammatory response, whereas for CC chemokines NH2‐terminal processing mostly results in reduced chemotactic potency.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulation of the Receptor Specificity and Function of the Chemokine RANTES (Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted) by Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (CD26)-mediated CleavageThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1997
- Human Chemokines: An UpdateAnnual Review of Immunology, 1997
- The Functional Role of the ELR Motif in CXC Chemokine-mediated AngiogenesisJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1995
- Limited and Defined Truncation at the C Terminus Enhances Receptor Binding and Degranulation Activity of the Neutrophil-activating Peptide 2 (NAP-2)Published by Elsevier ,1995
- Characterization of the Gene for Human Neutrophil-Activating Peptide 78 (ENA-78)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1994
- Interleukin‐8 processing by neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G and proteinase‐3FEBS Letters, 1994
- Generation of interleukin‐8 by plasmin from AVLPR‐interleukin‐8, the human fibroblast‐derived neutrophil chemotactic factorFEBS Letters, 1991
- Cloning and characterization of cDNAs for murine macrophage inflammatory protein 2 and its human homologues.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1990
- Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes secrete, apart from neutrophil-activating peptide 1/interleukin 8, a second neutrophil-activating protein. NH2-terminal amino acid sequence identity with melanoma growth stimulatory activity.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1990
- The chemotactic activity for granulocytes produced by virally infected fibroblasts is identical to monocyte‐derived interleukin 8European Journal of Immunology, 1989