Functions of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA): Are They Trainable?
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 47 (7) , 496-510
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298104700703
Abstract
A meta-analysis, the application of statistical methods to findings from a large collection of individual studies, is reported for the literature assessing the effectiveness of psycholinguistic training using the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA) as the criterion measure. The analysis establishes the efficacy of psycholinguistic training since the average child receiving psycholinguistic training performs better than 65% of untrained children. Additional data delineating results for ITPA subtests and various study characteristics support the primary finding. It was concluded that extant research, contrary to previous research reviews which were found to underestimate the positive effects of intervention, has demonstrated the effectiveness of psycholinguistic training.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effectiveness of Psycholinguistic Training: A Reaffirmation of PositionExceptional Children, 1978
- The Effectiveness of Psycholinguistic Training, a ReevaluationExceptional Children, 1978
- 9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of ResearchReview of Research in Education, 1977
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of ResearchEducational Researcher, 1976
- Research on Psycholinguistic Training: Critique and GuidelinesExceptional Children, 1975
- A ResponseExceptional Children, 1975
- The Effectiveness of Psycholinguistic TrainingExceptional Children, 1974
- Comparison of Revised and Experimental Editions of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic AbilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1973
- Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research StudiesHarvard Educational Review, 1971
- A Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness of Two Types of Preschool Compensatory ProgrammingThe Journal of Educational Research, 1969