Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Minnesota Nursing Homes
- 1 November 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 39 (11) , 1105-1109
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb02877.x
Abstract
To assess the experience of Minnesota nursing homes with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the policies and procedures used for its control. A 12-question survey, with primarily categorical responses, was mailed to the Directors of Nursing of all Minnesota long-term-care facilities. A follow-up mailing was sent to non-responders 5 weeks later. The mailing included a cover letter, a description of the study and its purposes, and a stamped return envelope. Four weeks after the second mailing, all non-responding institutions were contacted by telephone and invited to participated by mail or by completing the survey by telephone. All long-term-care facilities in Minnesota licensed for skilled and intermediate care. The survey was directed to the Directors of Nursing of the long-term-care facilities with the request that, if another individual was better able to complete it, the survey be forwarded to them. Completed responses were obtained from 88% (395/445) of all long-term-care facilities in Minnesota. Forty-eight institutions (12%) had residents colonized or infected with MRSA. Only four (8%) of these facilities stated that MRSA was a problem; however, 33 (69%) of facilities with MRSA had sought outside help or consultation from a variety of sources for its control. Few facilities (7%) had cultured residents specifically for MRSA. Policies regarding the admission of colonized or infected persons were reported by 14% and 21% of facilities, respectively, and over 40% of these policies stated that persons with MRSA would not be accepted. Policies regarding the care of MRSA-colonized or -infected persons were not uniform. Both metropolitan and non-metropolitan facilities had residents with MRSA. Our results suggest that MRSA in long-term-care facilities may be a widespread and underrecognized problem. There is a need to develop uniform policies for the control of MRSA in nursing homes. These policies should consider the sources and objectives of long-term-care facilities.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in New York health care facilities, 1988. The New York MRSA Study Group.American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in a Nursing Home: Eradication With MupirocinInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1990
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Laboratory and epidemiologic experience with methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in the USAEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1986
- Epidemiology and control of the ‘modern’ methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Hospital Infection, 1986
- Infections end infection risk in residents of long-term care facilities: A review of the literature, 1970–1994American Journal of Infection Control, 1985
- Nosocomial infections among patients in a long-term care facility: Spectrum, prevalence, and risk factorsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1985
- Infections among Patients in Nursing HomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- An Outbreak of Infections Caused by Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Resistant to Methicillin and Aminoglycosides. I. Clinical StudiesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- Clinical, epidemiologic and bacteriologic observations of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus at a large community hospitalThe American Journal of Medicine, 1976