Takeovers, market monitoring, and international corporate governance
- 16 September 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The RAND Journal of Economics
- Vol. 39 (3) , 850-874
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00041.x
Abstract
We theoretically and empirically examine the role of international takeover markets in curtailing dominant shareholder moral hazard for firms with higher value‐added from acquisitions. In equilibrium, such firms strategically list shares in the markets of their targets and voluntarily dilute dominant shareholder control through capital‐raising events to lower their expected acquisition costs. Empirical tests, using a sample of foreign firms cross‐listing on U.S. stock exchanges during 1990–2003, support the framework. We find a strong influence of post‐listing dilution of dominant shareholder control through capital‐raising events on the likelihood of acquisitions and their cost to the acquirers, in both U.S. and non‐U.S. markets.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The World of Cross-Listings and Cross-Listings of the World: Challenging Conventional Wisdom*European Finance Review, 2006
- The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and AcquisitionsThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- Do Non-U.S. Firms Issue Equity on U.S. Stock Exchanges to Relax Capital Constraints?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2005
- What is the Effect of Cross-Listing on Corporate Ownership and Control?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- International Cross-Listing and the Bonding HypothesisSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- GOLBALIZATION, CORPORATE FINANCE, AND THE COST OF CAPITALJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1999
- Law and FinanceJournal of Political Economy, 1998
- A Theoretical Analysis of the Investor Protection Regulations Argument for Global Listing of StocksSSRN Electronic Journal, 1998
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Mergers and the Market for Corporate ControlJournal of Political Economy, 1965