A Unified Theory of Two-Stage Adaptive Designs
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Vol. 97 (460) , 1034-1041
- https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502388618852
Abstract
Adaptation of a clinical trial occurs when there is a change from the planned course of action in design, sample size, or method of analysis. There are many proposed adaptations in the literature, but no comprehensive mathematical theory to support them. The standard Neyman–Pearson theory is not suitable for the setting, and its use may result in invalid inference. This article provides a general formulation of adaptation, under which its validity can be broadly and rigorously established. The basic theory on distribution, stochastic independence, point estimation, confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and asymptotics is developed. Various examples are given to illustrate applications of the theory. The goal is to provide a solid theoretical foundation to aid the development of adaptive methods for clinical investigations.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Sample Size and Inference for Two‐Stage Adaptive DesignsBiometrics, 2001
- Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential TrialsBiometrics, 1999
- Nonparametric Estimation of a Delay Distribution Based on Left‐Censored and Right‐Truncated DataBiometrics, 1999
- Self-designing clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- Evaluation of Experiments with Adaptive Interim AnalysesPublished by JSTOR ,1994
- Sample size re-estimation without unblinding for normally distributed outcomes with unknown varianceCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1992
- Discussion of papers of session 3: Bayes/empirical bayesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Monitoring of the data for evidence of adverse or beneficial treatment effectsControlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- Nonparametric Estimation of LocationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- A Two-Sample Test for a Linear Hypothesis Whose Power is Independent of the VarianceThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1945