Comparing Costs and Quality of Care at Retail Clinics With That of Other Medical Settings for 3 Common Illnesses
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 151 (5) , 321-328
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00006
Abstract
Retail clinics are an increasingly popular source for medical care. Concerns have been raised about the effect of these clinics on the cost, quality, and delivery of preventive care. To compare the care received at retail clinics for 3 acute conditions with that received at other care settings. Claims data from 2005 and 2006 from the health plan were aggregated into care episodes (units that included initial and follow-up visits, pharmaceuticals, and ancillary tests). After 2100 episodes (700 each) were identified in which otitis media, pharyngitis, and urinary tract infection (UTI) were treated first in retail clinics, these episodes were matched with other episodes in which these illnesses were treated first in physician offices, urgent care centers, or emergency departments. Enrollees of a large Minnesota health plan. Enrollees who received care for otitis media, pharyngitis, or UTI. Costs per episode, performance on 14 quality indicators, and receipt of 7 preventive care services at the initial appointment or subsequent 3 months. Overall costs of care for episodes initiated at retail clinics were substantially lower than those of matched episodes initiated at physician offices, urgent care centers, and emergency departments ($110 vs. $166, $156, and $570, respectively; P < 0.001 for each comparison). Prescription costs were similar in retail clinics, physician offices, and urgent care centers ($21, $21, and $22), as were aggregate quality scores (63.6%, 61.0%, and 62.6%) and patient's receipt of preventive care (14.5%, 14.2%, and 13.7%) (P > 0.05 vs. retail clinics). In emergency departments, average prescription costs were higher and aggregate quality scores were significantly lower than in other settings. A limited number of quality measures and preventive care services were studied. Despite matching, patients at different care sites might differ in their severity of illness. Retail clinics provide less costly treatment than physician offices or urgent care centers for 3 common illnesses, with no apparent adverse effect on quality of care or delivery of preventive care. California HealthCare Foundation.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retail Clinics, Primary Care Physicians, And Emergency Departments: A Comparison Of Patients’ VisitsHealth Affairs, 2008
- Use And Costs Of Care In Retail Clinics Versus Traditional Care SitesHealth Affairs, 2008
- Primary Care Physicians Who Treat Blacks and WhitesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Excess Length of Stay, Charges, and Mortality Attributable to Medical Injuries During HospitalizationJAMA, 2003
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal PharyngitisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctorsBMJ, 2002
- Principles of Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Acute Pharyngitis in Adults: BackgroundAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Gouging The Medically Uninsured: A Tale Of Two BillsHealth Affairs, 2000
- Primary Care Outcomes in Patients Treated by Nurse Practitioners or PhysiciansJAMA, 2000