Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 April 2002
- Vol. 324 (7341) , 819-823
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether nurse practitioners can provide care at first point of contact equivalent to doctors in a primary care setting. Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies. Data sources: Cochrane controlled trials register, specialist register of trials maintained by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, science citation index, database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness, national research register, hand searches, and published bibliographies. Included studies: Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies comparing nurse practitioners and doctors providing care at first point of contact for patients with undifferentiated health problems in a primary care setting and providing data on one or more of the following outcomes: patient satisfaction, health status, costs, and process of care. Results: 11 trials and 23 observational studies met all the inclusion criteria. Patients were more satisfied with care by a nurse practitioner (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.47). No differences in health status were found. Nurse practitioners had longer consultations (weighted mean difference 3.67 minutes, 2.05 to 5.29) and made more investigations (odds ratio 1.22, 1.02 to 1.46) than did doctors. No differences were found in prescriptions, return consultations, or referrals. Quality of care was in some ways better for nurse practitioner consultations. Conclusion: Increasing availability of nurse practitioners in primary care is likely to lead to high levels of patient satisfaction and high quality care. What is already known on this topic Nurse practitioners have existed in North America for many years An increasing number of such nurses are being employed in the United Kingdom in general practice, emergency departments, and other primary care settings Reviews suggest that nurse practitioners are equivalent to doctors on most variables studied, but the relevance of this in the context of the NHS is unclear What this study adds Patients are more satisfied with care from a nurse practitioner than from a doctor, with no difference in health outcomes Nurse practitioners provide longer consultations and carry out more investigations than doctors Most recent research has related to patients requesting same day appointments for minor illness, which is only a limited part of a doctor's roleKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- Nurse practitioners in primary careFamily Practice, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary careBMJ, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary careBMJ, 2000
- Primary Care Outcomes in Patients Treated by Nurse Practitioners or PhysiciansJAMA, 2000
- Collaborative practice and provider styles of delivering health careSocial Science & Medicine, 1990
- The St John's Randomized Trial of the Family Practice Nurse: Health Outcomes of PatientsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1978
- Well-Child Care by Pediatric Nurse Practitioners in a Large Group PracticeAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children, 1976
- The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner: Health Outcomes of PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1974
- The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse PractitionerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974