Reconstructing Program Theories: Methods Available and Problems to be Solved
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 24 (1) , 5-20
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400102
Abstract
This paper discusses methods for reconstructing theories underlying programs and policies. It describes three approaches. One is empirical-analytical in nature and focuses on interviews, documents and argumentational analysis. The second has strategic assessment, group dynamics, and dialogue as its core. The third has cognitive and organizational psychology as its foundation. For each of the three approaches, case-illustrations are given. These approaches can help to make the process of reconstructing underlying program theories more open for scrutiny. This is important because mis-reconstruction of policy and program theories is dangerous. All three approaches have a number of weaknesses to be remedied. The paper discusses these shortcomings and presents some suggestions for overcoming the limitations are presented.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- EditorialEvaluation, 2001
- EditorialEvaluation, 2001
- A Postscript on Thinking about DialogueEvaluation, 2001
- The false choice between theory‐based evaluation and experimentationNew Directions for Evaluation, 2000
- Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problemsNew Directions for Evaluation, 2000
- Summing up program theoryNew Directions for Evaluation, 2000
- Evaluating Anti-Corruption Initiatives: Underlying Logic and Mid-Term Impact of a World Bank ProgramEvaluation, 1999
- Evaluating Services for People with DisabilitiesEvaluation, 1996
- Policy theories, knowledge utilization, and evaluationKnowledge and Policy, 1991
- Assumptional analysis: An elucidation and appraisal for systems practitionersSystemic Practice and Action Research, 1989