Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi: What a Powerful Machine can Achieve
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 169 (3) , 878-880
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000051896.15091.0c
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL, Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia) for distal ureteral calculi with the HM3 (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc.) lithotriptor. Materials and Methods: A total of 585 consecutive patients with distal ureteral calculi were treated with ESWL using an unmodified HM3 lithotriptor. Of these patients 67 referred for treatment only for whom no followup was available were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 518 cases were followed until they were radiologically documented to be stone-free or considered treatment failures. Before ESWL additional procedures were performed in 144 patients, including stone push back, ureteral catheter or Double-J (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) stent placement, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteral endoscopic maneuvers or stone basket manipulation. A total of 374 patients needed no preliminary treatment before ESWL. Results: Of the 518 patients 469 (91%) were successfully treated with 1 ESWL session, while 49 (9%) needed 2 or 3. Manipulation after ESWL was performed in 22 cases, including stent placement, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteral endoscopic stone removal and a stone basket procedure. On day 1 after ESWL 327 patients (63%) were stone-free, 158 (30%) had less than 5 mm. fragments and 33 (7%) had more than 5 mm. fragments. At 3 months the stone-free rate increased to 97%. Conclusions: These data show that ESWL for distal ureteral calculi with the powerful unmodified HM3 lithotriptor has a high success rate with a low rate of minimally traumatic manipulations before and after intervention. Results in terms of the re-treatment and stone-free rates are superior to those of any other second or third generation lithotriptor and comparable to the results of the best ureteroscopic series.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND URETEROSCOPY FOR MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, 2001
- EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS URETEROSCOPY FOR DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDYJournal of Urology, 1999
- A COMPARISON OF URETEROSCOPY TO IN SITU EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, 1999
- URETERAL STONES CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, 1997
- EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSYUrologic Clinics of North America, 1997
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Multicenter Study of Kidney and Upper Ureter Versus Middle and Lower Ureter TreatmentsJournal of Urology, 1994
- Nonstent or noncatheter extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stonesUrology, 1994
- ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?World Journal of Urology, 1993
- Efficacy of Second Generation Lithotriptors: A Multicenter Comparative Study of 2,206 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone LithotriptorsJournal of Urology, 1992
- Comparison of Intravenous Sedative-Analgesic Techniques for Outpatient Immersion LithotripsyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1991