Interpretation of selected accident and emergency radiographic examinations by radiographers: a review of 11000 cases.
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 72 (858) , 546-551
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.72.858.10560335
Abstract
Two specially trained radiographers took part in the radiologists' rota for "cold" reporting skeletal radiographs of patients who attended the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department at times when there was no "hot" reporting service operating, and who were not admitted for treatment or referred to fracture clinics for follow-up. These radiographs had initially been seen by A&E medical staff. At the end of an 18 month period during which the two radiographers reported on 11,322 skeletal examinations, a retrospective search was made to detect interpretive errors. The radiological history of all 11,322 patients was reviewed over a follow-up period of at least 3 months subsequent to the attendance reported by the radiographers. 48% of patients did not re-attend, 42% re-attended for unrelated examinations, and 10% re-attended for repeat examinations of the same anatomical area, or for different procedures (bone scintigraphy or CT) related to the original injury. The second (or subsequent) report was discrepant with that of the first attendance in only 29 cases out of 1103. Of these 29 patients, 13 had occult fractures which were undetectable at first attendance even in retrospect, six had new injuries accounting for the new findings, six had been the subject of false positive calls at an earlier visit, one had a fracture of the hamate missed at first attendance, and in three cases no consensus could be reached as to the cause of the discrepancy, owing to incomplete films or insufficient clinical data. Analysis of the patients' postcodes showed at least 89% were of local origin and only 1% were from outside Yorkshire, suggesting that the review should have identified the great majority of erroneous reports. It is concluded that appropriately trained and supervised radiographers can successfully undertake diagnostic reporting of selected skeletal examinations on A&E patients.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plain film reporting by radiographers—a feasibility studyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1996
- Reporting of fracture radiographs by radiographers: the impact of a training programmeThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994
- An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasoundClinical Radiology, 1994
- Should radiologists report on every film?Clinical Radiology, 1992
- Plain film reporting in the UKClinical Radiology, 1991
- Accident and emergency reporting in UK teaching departmentsClinical Radiology, 1990
- Accuracy of detection of radiographic abnormalities by junior doctors.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1988
- Some rare medical complications of pregnancy.BMJ, 1985
- An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980