Supererogation and altruism: a comment
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 28 (2) , 75-76
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.2.75
Abstract
Supererogation can be distinguished from altruism, in that the former is located in the category of duty but exceeds the strict requirements of duty, whereas altruism belongs to a different moral category from duty. It follows that doctors do not act altruistically in their professional roles. Individual doctors may sometimes show supererogation, but supererogation is not a necessary feature of the medical profession. The aim of medicine is to act in the best interests of patients. This aim involves neither supererogation nor even the moral quality of beneficence. It is simply a job description. Morality enters medicine through the quality of the individual doctor's work, not by the definition of that work.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Supererogation and the profession of medicineJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Are doctors altruistic?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Looking Back on the Millennium in MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Professional ethics: further comments.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1986
- Do doctors owe a special duty of beneficence to their patients?Journal of Medical Ethics, 1986
- Professions as the conscience of society.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1985